From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McGraw v. Kim

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Nov 1, 2022
2:22-cv-01414-APG-NJK (D. Nev. Nov. 1, 2022)

Opinion

2:22-cv-01414-APG-NJK

11-01-2022

JOHN MCGRAW, Plaintiff, v. CHARLES KIM, et al, Defendants.


ORDER

[Docket No. 22]

NANCY J. KOPPE, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pending before the Court is Defendants' proposed discovery plan. Docket No. 22. Proposed discovery plans must be submitted as a stipulation. Local Rule 26-1(a). Written stipulations must be signed by all parties or their attorneys. Local Rule 7-1(a). Defendants' proposed discovery plan has not been signed by Plaintiff's counsel, Docket No. 22 at 3, and is therefore not properly submitted. Further, Defendants ask the Court for a stay of discovery without addressing the proper standards. Id. at 2.

Accordingly. Defendants' proposed discovery plan is DENIED without prejudice. Docket No. 22. Plaintiffs counsel must meet and confer with corursel for Defendants. A properly formatted joint proposed discovery plan, or a proper r equest to stay discovery, must be submitted no later than November 8, 2022.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

McGraw v. Kim

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Nov 1, 2022
2:22-cv-01414-APG-NJK (D. Nev. Nov. 1, 2022)
Case details for

McGraw v. Kim

Case Details

Full title:JOHN MCGRAW, Plaintiff, v. CHARLES KIM, et al, Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, District of Nevada

Date published: Nov 1, 2022

Citations

2:22-cv-01414-APG-NJK (D. Nev. Nov. 1, 2022)