From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McGowan v. Weinstein

United States District Court, Central District of California
Dec 6, 2021
2:19-cv-09105-ODW (GJSx) (C.D. Cal. Dec. 6, 2021)

Opinion

2:19-cv-09105-ODW (GJSx)

12-06-2021

ROSE MCGOWAN, Plaintiff, v. HARVEY WEINSTEIN, et al., Defendants.


JUDGMENT

OTIS D. WRIGHT, II UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Pursuant to the Court's November 9, 2021 Order (ECF No. 92) and its December 6, 2021 Minute Order (ECF No. 101), it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED as follows:

1. Plaintiff Rose McGowan shall take nothing from Defendants Harvey Weinstein; David Boies; Boies Schiller Flexner, LLP; Lisa Bloom; The Bloom Firm; and B.C. Strategies Ltd. on her first claim for violations of the Racketeering Influences and Corrupt Organizations Act (“RICO”).

2. Plaintiffs RICO claim is DISMISSED ON THE MERITS AND WITH PREJUDICE as against all Defendants.

3. The Court declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the remainder of the case and accordingly DISMISSES all remaining claims in this action WITHOUT PREJUDICE

The Clerk of the Court shall close the case.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

McGowan v. Weinstein

United States District Court, Central District of California
Dec 6, 2021
2:19-cv-09105-ODW (GJSx) (C.D. Cal. Dec. 6, 2021)
Case details for

McGowan v. Weinstein

Case Details

Full title:ROSE MCGOWAN, Plaintiff, v. HARVEY WEINSTEIN, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Dec 6, 2021

Citations

2:19-cv-09105-ODW (GJSx) (C.D. Cal. Dec. 6, 2021)