From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McGowan v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee, at Knoxville
Jul 11, 2008
No. M2008-00530-CCA-R3-PC (Tenn. Crim. App. Jul. 11, 2008)

Opinion

No. M2008-00530-CCA-R3-PC.

Filed July 11, 2008.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Rutherford County; No. F-27902; Don R. Ash, Judge.

Judgment of the Circuit Court Affirmed Pursuant to Rule 20, Rules of the Court of Criminal Appeals.

Johnny L. McGowan, Jr., Pro Se.

Robert E. Cooper, Jr., Attorney General and Reporter; Lacy Elaine Wilber, Assistant Attorney General; and William C. Whitesell, Jr., District Attorney General, for the appellee, State of Tennessee.

David H. Welles, J., delivered the opinion of the court, in which Jerry L. Smith and Robert W. Wedemeyer, JJ., joined.


MEMORANDUM OPINION


The Petitioner, Johnny L. McGowan, Jr., appeals from the trial court's dismissal of his petition for a writ of error coram nobis. The State has filed a motion requesting that this Court affirm the trial court's denial of relief pursuant to Rule 20, Rules of the Court of Criminal Appeals. We grant the State's motion and affirm the judgment of the trial court.

In 1994, the Petitioner pleaded guilty to and was found guilty of the offense of arson. In 2008, the Petitioner filed a petition for a writ of error coram nobis seeking relief from his 1994 arson conviction. The trial court summarily dismissed the petition both because it did not state proper grounds for error coram nobis relief and also because it was barred by the one-year statute of limitations for seeking a writ of error coram nobis. It is from the order dismissing his petition that the Petitioner appeals.

As grounds for relief, the Petitioner asserted that his conviction was void because the grand jury illegally indicted him for a crime other than the crime which had been bound over to the grand jury. The Petitioner asserts that this legal argument attacking the action of the grand jury constitutes "newly discovered and subsequent evidence."

We conclude that the trial court correctly dismissed the petition. We see no need for further analysis. We conclude that the Petitioner's argument is totally without merit.

We therefore grant the State's motion and affirm the judgment of the trial court pursuant to Tennessee Court of Criminal Appeals Rule 20.


Summaries of

McGowan v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee, at Knoxville
Jul 11, 2008
No. M2008-00530-CCA-R3-PC (Tenn. Crim. App. Jul. 11, 2008)
Case details for

McGowan v. State

Case Details

Full title:JOHNNY L. MCGOWAN, JR. v. STATE OF TENNESSEE

Court:Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee, at Knoxville

Date published: Jul 11, 2008

Citations

No. M2008-00530-CCA-R3-PC (Tenn. Crim. App. Jul. 11, 2008)

Citing Cases

McGowan v. State

Apr. 4, 2010); Johnny L. McGowan, Jr. v. Howard Carlton, No. E2007-00636-CCA-R3-HC (Tenn. Crim. App., at…

McGowan v. Lester

Crim. App. Oct. 20, 2009); Johnny L. McGowan, Jr. v. State, No. M2008-01813-CCA-R3-PC, 2008 WL 4756455 (Tenn.…