From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McGoldrick v. 2100 Park Associates

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jan 9, 2001
279 A.D.2d 287 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)

Opinion

January 9, 2001.

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Anne Targum, J.), entered April 12, 1999, which granted defendant 2100 Park Associates' motion to dismiss the complaint as time-barred, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Before: Rosenberger, J.P., Andrias, Wallach, Lerner, Buckley, JJ.

Robert J. Barsch, for plaintiff-appellant.

Russell G. Monaco, for defendant-respondent.


The determination in the appealed order that plaintiff's action was time-barred, was not made in violation of the law of the case doctrine. Defendant 2100 Park Associates' original motion to dismiss the complaint on the grounds, inter alia, that it was barred by the Statute of Limitations was denied on the procedural ground that defendant's counsel failed to appear for oral argument, and not on the merits. Defendant promptly moved again for the same relief, but the court failed to address that portion of the motion that sought dismissal of the complaint as barred by the Statute of Limitations. Defendant's third motion for the same relief sought a ruling of the still pending issue, and the presently appealed order, entered April 12, 1999, constituted the first resolution on the merits of defendant's Statute of Limitations defense.


Summaries of

McGoldrick v. 2100 Park Associates

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jan 9, 2001
279 A.D.2d 287 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
Case details for

McGoldrick v. 2100 Park Associates

Case Details

Full title:KATHLEEN KEANE McGOLDRICK, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. 2100 PARK ASSOCIATES…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jan 9, 2001

Citations

279 A.D.2d 287 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
718 N.Y.S.2d 823

Citing Cases

Goddard v. Kevin Sean O'Donoghue, Esq.

Since plaintiff's claims lack merit, the court denies plaintiff's cross-motion for a default judgment.…