Opinion
CIVIL 4:24-cv-247-SDJ-BD
11-20-2024
MEMORANDUM ADOPTING THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
SEAN D. JORDAN, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Came on for consideration the report of the United States Magistrate Judge in this action, this matter having been heretofore referred to the Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. On October 15, 2024, the Magistrate Judge entered proposed findings of fact and a recommendation (the “Report”), (Dkt. #23), that Plaintiff's complaint, (Dkt. #3), be dismissed without prejudice.
Having received the Report, and no timely objections being filed, the Court determines that the findings and conclusions contained in the Report should be ADOPTED in part and MODIFIED in part. Because Plaintiffs' complaint inadequately alleges jurisdiction and capacity to sue for the reasons explained in the Report, it should be dismissed. It is the practice of this Court, however, to afford litigants at least one opportunity to cure pleading deficiencies before dismissing a case, unless it is clear that the defects are incurable. See, e.g., Brady v. Evangelical Lutheran Good Samaritan Soc'y, No. 4:22-CV-841-SDJ, 2023 WL 6393882, at *6 (E.D. Tex. Oct. 2, 2023).
It is therefore ORDERED that the complaint, (Dkt. # 3), is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
It is further ORDERED that Plaintiffs have fourteen days from the date of this order to amend the complaint to cure the deficiencies identified in the Report (Dkt. # 23). If no amended complaint is filed within fourteen days, the complaint, (Dkt. # 3), will be dismissed with prejudice.
SO ORDERED.