From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McGillvary v. Dorsey

United States District Court, Western District of Washington
Jan 11, 2023
C22-5883 BHS (W.D. Wash. Jan. 11, 2023)

Opinion

C22-5883 BHS

01-11-2023

CALEB L. MCGILLVARY, Plaintiff, v. LAMONT DORSEY, Defendant.


ORDER

BENJAMIN H. SETTLE United States District Judge.

THIS MATTER is before the Court on pro se Plaintiff Caleb McGillvary's motion to seal, Dkt. 7, and his applications to proceed in forma pauperis, Dkts. 1 and 6. The Clerk informed McGillvary that his initial application was deficient, Dkts. 2 and 3, and in response he paid the filing fee and filed his complaint, Dkt. 4. McGillvary has since renewed his request to proceed in forma pauperis, Dkt. 6, and his filing includes what he contends is personal financial information. McGillvary asks the Court to file his in forma pauperis applications under seal to protect his privacy. Dkt. 7.

The motion to seal, Dkt. 7, is GRANTED and the Clerk shall place McGillvary's in forma pauperis applications, Dkts. 1 and 6, under seal.

To the extent it is still pending, McGillvary's application to proceed in forma pauperis, Dkt. 6, is DENIED as moot because he already paid the filing fee.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

McGillvary v. Dorsey

United States District Court, Western District of Washington
Jan 11, 2023
C22-5883 BHS (W.D. Wash. Jan. 11, 2023)
Case details for

McGillvary v. Dorsey

Case Details

Full title:CALEB L. MCGILLVARY, Plaintiff, v. LAMONT DORSEY, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Western District of Washington

Date published: Jan 11, 2023

Citations

C22-5883 BHS (W.D. Wash. Jan. 11, 2023)