From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McGill v. Snyder

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Jan 23, 2007
214 F. App'x 330 (4th Cir. 2007)

Opinion

No. 06-7457.

Submitted: January 18, 2007.

Decided: January 23, 2007.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan, Chief District Judge. (5:05-ct-00249-FL).

James Michael McGill, Appellant Pro Se. James Redfern Morgan, Jr., Womble, Carlyle, Sandridge Rice, PLLC, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Before WILKINSON, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


James Michael McGill appeals the district court's order denying relief on his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. McGill v. Snyder, No. 5:05-ct-00249-FL (E.D.N.C. Aug. 8, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

McGill v. Snyder

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Jan 23, 2007
214 F. App'x 330 (4th Cir. 2007)
Case details for

McGill v. Snyder

Case Details

Full title:James Michael MCGILL, Plaintiff — Appellant, v. George E. SNYDER; David…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Jan 23, 2007

Citations

214 F. App'x 330 (4th Cir. 2007)

Citing Cases

Ross v. Leberman

Error assigned, inter alia, was order, quoting record. Stanley Folz, of Sundheim, Folz Sundheim, for…

Langston v. Currie

Mr. J.A. Poore and Mr. N.A. Rotering, for Respondents, submitted a brief; Mr. Poore argued the cause orally.…