denying summary judgment to defendants on statute of limitations grounds and rejecting argument that media reports sufficed to put plaintiffs on notice because “there is no evidence that any of the plaintiffs read any of those articles or even received any of those newspapers.”
Summary of this case from Eidson v. Medtronic, Inc.E020452
Filed December 15, 1999 OMITTED
Deleted on direction of the Supreme Court by order dated March 22, 2000.
denying summary judgment to defendants on statute of limitations grounds and rejecting argument that media reports sufficed to put plaintiffs on notice because “there is no evidence that any of the plaintiffs read any of those articles or even received any of those newspapers.”
Summary of this case from Eidson v. Medtronic, Inc.Full title:JAMES L. McGILL, et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. M. J. BROCK SONS…
Court:Court of Appeal of California, Fourth District, Division Two
Date published: Dec 15, 1999
Here, the Bells' complaint nowhere alleges that the Bells were aware of these articles, saw them, or read…