From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McGill v. Locklear

United States District Court, Middle District of North Carolina
Mar 14, 2024
1:23-cv-955 (M.D.N.C. Mar. 14, 2024)

Opinion

1:23-cv-955

03-14-2024

CHRISTOPHER CURTIS MCGILL, Plaintiff, v. D. LOCKLEAR, J. OSUNA, JOHN DOE, JOHN DOE 2, JOHN DOE 3, and JOHN DOE 4, Defendants.


ORDER

On November 21, 2023, the United States Magistrate Judge's Order and Recommendation (“Recommendation”) was filed, and notice was served on the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. (Docs. 2, 3.) No objections were filed within the time prescribed by Section 636.

Therefore, the court need not make a de novo review and the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation is hereby adopted.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation, (Doc. 2), is ADOPTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE to Plaintiff filing a new complaint, on the proper § 1983 forms, which corrects the defects cited in the Recommendation.

A Judgment dismissing this action will be entered contemporaneously with this Order.


Summaries of

McGill v. Locklear

United States District Court, Middle District of North Carolina
Mar 14, 2024
1:23-cv-955 (M.D.N.C. Mar. 14, 2024)
Case details for

McGill v. Locklear

Case Details

Full title:CHRISTOPHER CURTIS MCGILL, Plaintiff, v. D. LOCKLEAR, J. OSUNA, JOHN DOE…

Court:United States District Court, Middle District of North Carolina

Date published: Mar 14, 2024

Citations

1:23-cv-955 (M.D.N.C. Mar. 14, 2024)