From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McGhee v. Meiser

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN
Jul 3, 2012
12-cv-447-slc (W.D. Wis. Jul. 3, 2012)

Opinion

12-cv-447-slc

07-03-2012

LADERIAN T. McGHEE, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL MEISER, MS. VICKY KAMRATH, LORI ALSUM and DR. D. SULIENE, Defendants.


ORDER

Plaintiff Laderian T. McGhee, a prisoner at the Columbia Correctional Institution in Waupun, Wisconsin has submitted a proposed complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. He asks for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. Because plaintiff is a prisoner, he is subject to the 1996 Prisoner Litigation Reform Act. This means that before this court may decide whether he can proceed with his complaint in forma pauperis, plaintiff will have to make an initial partial payment of the filing fee.

In determining whether a prisoner litigant qualifies for indigent status this court applies the formula set forth in 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1). According to this formula, a prisoner requesting leave to proceed in forma pauperis must prepay 20% of the greater of the average monthly balance or the average monthly deposits made to his prison account in the six-month period immediately preceding the filing of the complaint.

In this case, 20% of the average monthly deposits is $12.44, but 20% of the average monthly balance made to his account is $176.00. Because the greater of the two amounts is 20% of the average monthly balance, or $176.00, that is the amount plaintiff will be assessed as an initial partial payment of the filing fee. If plaintiff does not have the money to make the initial partial payment in his regular account, he will have to arrange with prison authorities to pay some or all of the assessment from his release account. This does not mean that plaintiff is free to ask prison authorities to pay all of his filing fee from his release account. The only amount plaintiff must pay at this time is the $176.00 initial partial payment. Before prison officials take any portion of that amount from plaintiff's release account, they may first take from plaintiff's regular account whatever amount up to the full amount plaintiff owes. Plaintiff should show a copy of this order to prison officials to insure that they are aware they should send plaintiff's initial partial payment to this court.

With his complaint, plaintiff has also filed a motion to use his release account funds to pay the entire fee for filing this case. See dkt. 2. Although it is commendable that plaintiff is taking responsibility for paying his entire filing fee promptly, he cannot use his release account funds in the manner he requests. The language in 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1) suggests that prison officials are required to use a prisoner's release account to satisfy an initial partial payment if no other funds are available. Carter v. Bennett, 399 F. Supp. 2d 936, 936-37 (W.D. Wis. 2005). However, with the exception of initial partial payments, federal courts lack the authority to tell state officials whether and to what extent a prisoner should be able to withdraw money from his release account. Because plaintiff cannot use his release account funds to pay the entire balance of the $350 filing fee, I will deny his motion.

ORDER

IT IS ORDERED that:

1. Plaintiff Laderian McGhee's motion to use his release account funds to pay the entire filing fee in this case, dkt. 2, is DENIED;

2. Plaintiff is assessed $176.00 as an initial partial payment of the $350 fee for filing this case. He is to submit a check or money order made payable to the clerk of court in the amount of $176.00 on or before July 24, 2012. If, by July 24, 2012, plaintiff fails to make the initial partial payment or show cause for his failure to do so, he will be held to have withdrawn this action voluntarily. In that event, the clerk of court is directed to close this file without prejudice to plaintiff's filing his case at a later date.

BY THE COURT:

___________

STEPHEN L. CROCKER

Magistrate Judge


Summaries of

McGhee v. Meiser

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN
Jul 3, 2012
12-cv-447-slc (W.D. Wis. Jul. 3, 2012)
Case details for

McGhee v. Meiser

Case Details

Full title:LADERIAN T. McGHEE, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL MEISER, MS. VICKY KAMRATH, LORI…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN

Date published: Jul 3, 2012

Citations

12-cv-447-slc (W.D. Wis. Jul. 3, 2012)