From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McGhee v. Light

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON
Jun 6, 2019
Case No. 3:19-cv-143 (S.D. Ohio Jun. 6, 2019)

Opinion

Case No. 3:19-cv-143

06-06-2019

NAKELA MCGHEE, et al., Plaintiffs, v. DR. DAWN LIGHT, et al., Defendants.



Magistrate Judge Michael J. Newman ORDER AND ENTRY: (1) ADOPTING THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE (DOC. 4); (2) DISMISSING PRO SE PLAINTIFFS' COMPLAINT WITHOUT PREJUDICE; AND (3) TERMINATING THIS CASE ON THE COURT'S DOCKET

The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Michael J. Newman (doc. 4), to whom this case was referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b). The parties have not filed objections to the Report and Recommendation and the time for doing so under Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) has expired. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that: (1) the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (doc. 4) be ADOPTED in its entirety; (2) pro se Plaintiffs' complaint (doc. 3) be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE; and (3) this case be TERMINATED on the Court's docket.

IT IS SO ORDERED. Date: 6·6·19

/s/_________

Walter H. Rice

United States District Judge


Summaries of

McGhee v. Light

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON
Jun 6, 2019
Case No. 3:19-cv-143 (S.D. Ohio Jun. 6, 2019)
Case details for

McGhee v. Light

Case Details

Full title:NAKELA MCGHEE, et al., Plaintiffs, v. DR. DAWN LIGHT, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON

Date published: Jun 6, 2019

Citations

Case No. 3:19-cv-143 (S.D. Ohio Jun. 6, 2019)