Opinion
2:20-cv-00334-RFB-BNW
04-14-2023
Early McGee, Plaintiff, v. United States of America; EURPAC Services, Inc., a Connecticut Corporation; Does I-X, and Roe Corporations I-X, inclusive, Defendants.
INJURY LAWYERS OF NEVADA Jared B. Anderson, Esq. Attorneys for Plaintiff LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH Chistopher Elsee, Esq. Attorneys for EURPAC Services JASON M. FRIERSON United States Attorney PATRICK A. ROSE Assistant United States Attorney Attorneys for the United States
INJURY LAWYERS OF NEVADA Jared B. Anderson, Esq. Attorneys for Plaintiff
LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH Chistopher Elsee, Esq. Attorneys for EURPAC Services
JASON M. FRIERSON United States Attorney PATRICK A. ROSE Assistant United States Attorney Attorneys for the United States
PROPOSED JOINT AMENDED DISCOVERY PLAN AND SCHEDULING ORDER
Pursuant to the Court's Order (ECF No. 67) (“Order”), Plaintiff Early McGee, Defendant EURPAC Services, Inc., and Federal Defendant the United States, propose the new discovery schedule set forth below.
In the Order, the Court addresses issues that were raised during motion practice in May-June 2022, which had been the months for initial and rebuttal expert disclosures. The Order includes a directive for the parties to submit a new proposed schedule for an independent medical examination, expert disclosures (initial and rebuttal), dispositive motions, and a joint pretrial order.
Accordingly, the parties propose the following deadlines:
| EVENT | DEADLINE |
| Independent Medical Examination | |
| Initial Expert Disclosures | 08/10/2023 |
| Rebuttal Expert Disclosures | 09/08/2023 |
| Discovery Cutoff | 10/09/2023 |
| Dispositive Motions | 11/08/2023 |
| Proposed Joint Pretrial Order |
The parties will work together to schedule the IME for a mutually convenient date and time.
However, if dispositive motions were filed, then the deadline for the Proposed Joint Pretrial Order would be deferred until 30 days after the Court rules on the dispositive motions.
IT IS SO ORDERED: