From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McGee v. Kan. Dep't of Corr.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS
Jul 28, 2020
CASE NO. 20-3201-SAC (D. Kan. Jul. 28, 2020)

Opinion

CASE NO. 20-3201-SAC

07-28-2020

ANTONIO ALEXANDER McGEE, Plaintiff, v. KANSAS DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Defendant.


ORDER

Plaintiff, Antonio Alexander McGee, who is currently incarcerated at the Hutchinson Correctional Facility in Hutchinson, Kansas ("HCF"), brings this civil rights case against the Kansas Department of Corrections.

Plaintiff is subject to the "three-strikes" provision under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). Court records fully establish that Plaintiff "has, on 3 or more prior occasions, while incarcerated . . . , brought an action or appeal in a court of the United States that was dismissed on the grounds that it is frivolous, malicious, or fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted." Accordingly, he may proceed in forma pauperis only if he establishes a threat of imminent danger of serious physical injury. Id.

Prior to filing the instant complaint on July 25, 2020, the court finds at least three prior civil actions filed by Plaintiff that qualify as "strikes" under § 1915(g). See McGee v. Doe, No. 20-3131-SAC (Doc. 3) (dismissing for failure to state a claim) (D. Kan. June 9, 2020); McGee v. Corizon, No. 20-3085-SAC (Doc. 11) (dismissed for failure to state a claim) (D. Kan. June 9, 2020); McGee v. Lawless, No. 19-3048-SAC (Doc. 24) (dismissed for failure to state a claim) (D. Kan. Dec. 11, 2019).

Plaintiff claims in Count I of his Complaint that the ventilation system is not sanitary because they have not been cleaned to remove the dust in the vents. Plaintiff claims in Count II that he was given medication and treated for a sore throat caused by MERSA. Plaintiff alleges that he believes he contracted the MERSA through the ventilation system because he is in segregation and is not aware of being around another inmate that has MERSA. Plaintiff alleges that "the only other way" he could have contracted MERSA was if HCF staff were putting things from inmates with diseases into other inmates' food.

"To meet the only exception to the prepayment requirement, a prisoner who has accrued three strikes must make 'specific, credible allegations of imminent danger of serious physical harm.'" Davis v. GEO Group Corr., 696 F. App'x 851, 854 (10th Cir. May 23, 2017) (unpublished) (quoting Hafed v. Fed. Bureau of Prisons, 635 F.3d 1172, 1179 (10th Cir. 2011)). The "imminent danger" exception has a temporal limitation—[t]he exception is construed narrowly and available only 'for genuine emergencies,' where 'time is pressing' and 'a threat . . . is real and proximate.'" Lynn v. Roberts, No. 11-3073-JAR, 2011 WL 3667171, at *2 (D. Kan. Aug. 22, 2011) (citation omitted). "Congress included an exception to the 'three strikes' rule for those cases in which it appears that judicial action is needed as soon as possible to prevent serious physical injuries from occurring in the meantime.'" Id. (citation omitted).

The Court has examined the Complaint and finds no showing of imminent danger of serious physical injury. Accordingly, pursuant to § 1915(g) Plaintiff may not proceed in forma pauperis in this civil action. Plaintiff is given time to pay the full $400.00 district court filing fee to the Court. If he fails to pay the full fee within the prescribed time, the Complaint will be dismissed based upon Plaintiff's failure to satisfy the statutory district court filing fee required by 28 U.S.C. § 1914.

If a person is not granted in forma pauperis status under § 1915, the fee to file a non-habeas civil action includes the $350.00 fee required by 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a) and a $50.00 general administrative fee pursuant to § 1914(b) and the District Court Miscellaneous Fee Schedule prescribed by the Judicial Conference of the United States. --------

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED BY THE COURT Plaintiff's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. 2) is denied.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff is granted until August 21, 2020, to submit the $400.00 filing fee. The failure to submit the fee by that date will result in the dismissal of this matter without prejudice and without additional prior notice.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated July 28, 2020, in Topeka, Kansas.

s/ Sam A. Crow

SAM A. CROW

U. S. Senior District Judge


Summaries of

McGee v. Kan. Dep't of Corr.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS
Jul 28, 2020
CASE NO. 20-3201-SAC (D. Kan. Jul. 28, 2020)
Case details for

McGee v. Kan. Dep't of Corr.

Case Details

Full title:ANTONIO ALEXANDER McGEE, Plaintiff, v. KANSAS DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS

Date published: Jul 28, 2020

Citations

CASE NO. 20-3201-SAC (D. Kan. Jul. 28, 2020)