From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McGee v. Gold

United States District Court, D. Vermont
Jul 13, 2005
File No. 1:04-CV-335 (D. Vt. Jul. 13, 2005)

Opinion

File No. 1:04-CV-335.

July 13, 2005


ORDER


The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation was filed June 21, 2005 (Paper 39). After de novo review and over objection, the Report and Recommendation is AFFIRMED, APPROVED and ADOPTED.See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). The defendants' motion to dismiss (Doc. 14) is GRANTED as to plaintiff David McGee. The case shall not be dismissed with respect to the intervenor-plaintiffs. Because McGee's claims are dismissed, his motions for appointment of counsel (Doc. 7) and preliminary injunctive relief (Doc. 33) are DENIED as moot. Finally, McGee's motion for permissive joinder, brought jointly by McGee and Byron Martin (Doc. 37), is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. The Court will not consolidate this case with the case brought by Martin, but Martin will be added as an intervenor-plaintiff, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 24(b), seeking injunctive and declaratory relief with respect to the constant illumination claim.

It is further certified that any appeal taken in forma pauperis from this Order would not be taken in good faith because such an appeal would be frivolous. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a).

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

McGee v. Gold

United States District Court, D. Vermont
Jul 13, 2005
File No. 1:04-CV-335 (D. Vt. Jul. 13, 2005)
Case details for

McGee v. Gold

Case Details

Full title:DAVID McGEE, Plaintiff and FREDERICK R. REED, LEROY W. HUGHES, ALFONSO…

Court:United States District Court, D. Vermont

Date published: Jul 13, 2005

Citations

File No. 1:04-CV-335 (D. Vt. Jul. 13, 2005)