From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McGee v. Chamberlin

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Apr 16, 2015
599 F. App'x 793 (9th Cir. 2015)

Opinion

No. 14-56173

04-16-2015

DEMITRIUS McGEE, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. CHAMBERLIN, M.D.; et al., Defendants - Appellees.


NOT FOR PUBLICATION

D.C. No. 3:13-cv-01020-WQH-JMA MEMORANDUM Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California
William Q. Hayes, District Judge, Presiding
Before: FISHER, TALLMAN, and NGUYEN, Circuit Judges.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

California state prisoner Demitrius McGee appeals pro se from the district court's judgment dismissing his action alleging Eighth Amendment violations in connection with his medical treatment. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo the district court's dismissal of an action as barred by the applicable statute of limitations, Ellis v. City of San Diego, 176 F.3d 1183, 1188 (9th Cir. 1999), and we affirm.

The district court dismissed McGee's claims as untimely, and he has failed to make a showing that his claims were not time-barred or entitled to any tolling beyond that afforded by the district court. See Cal. Civ. Proc. Code §§ 335.1, 352.1(a) (two-year statute of limitations for personal injury claims; two-year tolling period due to incarceration). Contrary to McGee's contention, the record shows that he had adequate notice of the grounds upon which his claims were dismissed.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

McGee v. Chamberlin

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Apr 16, 2015
599 F. App'x 793 (9th Cir. 2015)
Case details for

McGee v. Chamberlin

Case Details

Full title:DEMITRIUS McGEE, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. CHAMBERLIN, M.D.; et al.…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Apr 16, 2015

Citations

599 F. App'x 793 (9th Cir. 2015)