From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McGarry v. Pallito

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF VERMONT
Oct 26, 2012
File No. 1:09-cv-128 (D. Vt. Oct. 26, 2012)

Opinion

File No. 1:09-cv-128

10-26-2012

FINBAR McGARRY, Plaintiff, v. ANDREW PALLITO, GREG HALE, RICHARD BYRNES, RICHARD GALLOW, JOE WOLSKE, JOHN CANNON, CO FORCIER, SHERYLYN MATTHANS, JEFF COBB, PAUL CROSS, SAMUEL SANTOS, MICHAEL LIFF, VARIOUS TURNKEYS, EVELYN CUSHING, VARIOUS LAWYERS, WILLIAM SORRELL, STATE OF VERMONT, Defendants.


ORDER

The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation was filed September 19, 2012. (Doc. 48.) After de novo review and absent objection, the Report and Recommendation is AFFIRMED, APPROVED and ADOPTED. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1).

Non-party Isaac Faham's Petition to Intervene (Doc. 43) is DENIED without prejudice.

SO ORDERED.

Dated at Brattleboro, in the District of Vermont, this 26th day of October, 2012.

______________

Honorable J. Garvan Murtha

United States District Judge


Summaries of

McGarry v. Pallito

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF VERMONT
Oct 26, 2012
File No. 1:09-cv-128 (D. Vt. Oct. 26, 2012)
Case details for

McGarry v. Pallito

Case Details

Full title:FINBAR McGARRY, Plaintiff, v. ANDREW PALLITO, GREG HALE, RICHARD BYRNES…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF VERMONT

Date published: Oct 26, 2012

Citations

File No. 1:09-cv-128 (D. Vt. Oct. 26, 2012)