From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McGarry v. Johnson

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jan 19, 2023
2:23-cv-00102-TLN-AC (E.D. Cal. Jan. 19, 2023)

Opinion

2:23-cv-00102-TLN-AC

01-19-2023

DANIEL LAWRENCE McGARRY, Plaintiff, v. NICK JOHNSON, et al, Defendants.


ORDER

ALLISON CLAIRE, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Plaintiff is proceeding in this action pro se. This matter was accordingly referred to the undersigned by E.D. Cal. 302(c)(21). Plaintiff has requested leave to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. ECF No. 2.

Plaintiff's IFP application does not make the showing required by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1). According to the application, plaintiff has earned $50,000 in the past 12 months through his business and has collected $4,000 in unemployment. ECF No. 2 at 1. Plaintiff has assets including a home valued at $800,000.00, and his last filed income tax return, filed in 2021, reflected $107,000.00 income, and $400.00 in a bank account. Id. at 2. Considering plaintiff's income, assets, and expenses, plaintiff does not qualify for waiver of the court's $400.00 filing fee.

For plaintiff to continue prosecuting this case, he must pay the filing fee no later than February 3, 2023. If plaintiff fails to pay the filing fee, this case will be dismissed. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's request to proceed IFP (ECF No. 2) is DENIED, and plaintiff must pay the filing fee no later than February 3, 2023, or this case will be dismissed for failure to pay the filing fee.


Summaries of

McGarry v. Johnson

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jan 19, 2023
2:23-cv-00102-TLN-AC (E.D. Cal. Jan. 19, 2023)
Case details for

McGarry v. Johnson

Case Details

Full title:DANIEL LAWRENCE McGARRY, Plaintiff, v. NICK JOHNSON, et al, Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Jan 19, 2023

Citations

2:23-cv-00102-TLN-AC (E.D. Cal. Jan. 19, 2023)