From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McGarey v. Sisto

United States District Court, E.D. California
Feb 4, 2008
No. CIV S-07-2430 GEB KJM P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 4, 2008)

Opinion

No. CIV S-07-2430 GEB KJM P.

February 4, 2008


ORDER


Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Petitioner has paid the filing fee.

Since petitioner may be entitled to the requested relief if the claimed violation of constitutional rights is proved, respondents will be directed to file a response to petitioner's application.

In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Respondents are directed to file a response to petitioner's application within sixty days from the date of this order. See Rule 4, Fed.R. Governing § 2254 Cases. An answer shall be accompanied by any and all transcripts or other documents relevant to the determination of the issues presented in the application. See Rule 5, Fed.R. Governing § 2254 Cases. Because this petition challenges a denial of parole, the relevant documents should include the transcript of the January 5, 2006 parole hearing and any documents, reports or letters considered by the panel;

If respondent agrees that the exhibits attached to the petition are true and correct copies of the transcript of the hearing and all the materials considered by the panel, he need not provide an additional copy of the record, but rather may note his acceptance of the record in his answer.

2. Petitioner's reply, if any, shall be filed and served within thirty days of service of an answer;

3. If the response to petitioner's application is a motion, petitioner's opposition or statement of non-opposition shall be filed and served within thirty days of service of the motion, and respondents' reply, if any, shall be filed within fifteen days thereafter; and

4. The Clerk of the Court shall serve a copy of this order together with a copy of petitioner's application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 on Michael Patrick Farrell, Senior Assistant Attorney General.


Summaries of

McGarey v. Sisto

United States District Court, E.D. California
Feb 4, 2008
No. CIV S-07-2430 GEB KJM P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 4, 2008)
Case details for

McGarey v. Sisto

Case Details

Full title:JACK McGAREY, Petitioner, v. D.K. SISTO, Warden, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Feb 4, 2008

Citations

No. CIV S-07-2430 GEB KJM P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 4, 2008)