From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McFarland v. Cnty. of Santa Cruz

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION
May 13, 2013
Case No. C-12-01727 RMW (N.D. Cal. May. 13, 2013)

Opinion

Case No. C-12-01727 RMW

05-13-2013

SHANNON McFARLAND, Plaintiff, v. COUNTY OF SANTA CRUZ, SHERIFF PHIL WOWAK, OFFICER WILLIAM GAZZA, OFFICER CHRISTOPHER HANKES, OFFICER JOHN HABERMEHL, BRUCE MCFARLAND, and DOES 1-99, inclusive, Defendants.


ORDER VACATING REMAND ORDER

AND DISMISSING THE CASE

This court granted plaintiff Shannon McFarland's motion to remand on the basis that the court lacks subject matter jurisdiction over plaintiffs remaining claim against defendant Bruce McFarland. Dkt. No. 49 ("Remand Order"). Because plaintiff never filed a state court action, the appropriate remedy is not a remand, but rather a dismissal for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.

Accordingly, this court hereby VACATES the Remand Order and DISMISSES the case for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(h)(3) ("If the court determines at any time that it lacks subject-matter jurisdiction, the court must dismiss the action.").

_______________

Ronald M. Whyte

United States District Court Judge


Summaries of

McFarland v. Cnty. of Santa Cruz

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION
May 13, 2013
Case No. C-12-01727 RMW (N.D. Cal. May. 13, 2013)
Case details for

McFarland v. Cnty. of Santa Cruz

Case Details

Full title:SHANNON McFARLAND, Plaintiff, v. COUNTY OF SANTA CRUZ, SHERIFF PHIL WOWAK…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION

Date published: May 13, 2013

Citations

Case No. C-12-01727 RMW (N.D. Cal. May. 13, 2013)