From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McFaddin v. Sparks

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Apr 1, 1930
229 App. Div. 704 (N.Y. App. Div. 1930)

Opinion

April, 1930.

Present — Dowling, P.J., Merrell, McAvoy, O'Malley and Sherman, JJ., Sherman, J., dissents and votes for reversal on the ground that the writings would be sufficient under the Statute of Frauds, if signed by the parties, and that the remaining issue of agency should be determined in the manner provided by rule 108 of the Rules of Civil Practice, or upon trial.

See Real Property Law, § 259. — [REP.


Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. No opinion.


Summaries of

McFaddin v. Sparks

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Apr 1, 1930
229 App. Div. 704 (N.Y. App. Div. 1930)
Case details for

McFaddin v. Sparks

Case Details

Full title:HARRISON D. McFADDIN, Appellant, v. JOHN C. SPARKS, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Apr 1, 1930

Citations

229 App. Div. 704 (N.Y. App. Div. 1930)