From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McFadden v. Wong

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Oct 10, 2023
2:22-cv-1234 AC P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 10, 2023)

Opinion

2:22-cv-1234 AC P

10-10-2023

DONTAE LARAIL MCFADDEN, Plaintiff, v. SAM WONG, Defendant.


ORDER

ALLISON CLAIRE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On August 30, 2023, defendant filed a motion to compel discovery on the ground that plaintiff has completely failed to respond to discovery. ECF No. 28. The time for responding has now passed and plaintiff has not responded. Plaintiff will be given one final opportunity to respond.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that within twenty-one days of the service of this order, plaintiff shall file a response to defendant's motion to compel. Failure to respond will be deemed a waiver of any opposition to the granting of the motion and may result in the imposition of sanctions or a recommendation that this action be dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). See L.R. 230(1). DATED: October 10, 2023 .


Summaries of

McFadden v. Wong

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Oct 10, 2023
2:22-cv-1234 AC P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 10, 2023)
Case details for

McFadden v. Wong

Case Details

Full title:DONTAE LARAIL MCFADDEN, Plaintiff, v. SAM WONG, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Oct 10, 2023

Citations

2:22-cv-1234 AC P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 10, 2023)