From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McFadden v. Isseks Bros. Inc.

Appellate Term of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Apr 8, 2005
2005 N.Y. Slip Op. 50509 (N.Y. App. Term 2005)

Opinion

57050304.

Decided April 8, 2005.

Defendant appeals from a judgment of the Small Claims Part of the Civil Court, New York County, entered on or about December 30, 2003 after a nonjury trial (Debra Rose Samuels, J.) in favor of plaintiff, and awarding her damages in the principal sum of $2,625.

Judgment entered on or about December 30, 2003 (Debra Rose Samuels, J.) affirmed, without costs.

PRESENT: HON. LUCINDO SUAREZ, P.J., HON. WILLIAM P. McCOOE, HON. MARTIN SCHOENFELD, Justices.


The defendant's lone appellate argument that the small claims action is preempted by federal law governing employment benefits ( see Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 [ 29 USC § 1001 et seq]) was not raised during the trial proceedings, and thus is not properly before us ( cf. Adsit v. Quantum Chem. Corp, 199 AD2d 899, 900). In any event, defendant's preemption claim is without merit, since the action stems from a salary dispute and "the existence of the pension plan [was not] a critical factor in establishing the extent of defendant's liability" ( id.; see also Oxford Health Plans v. BetterCare Health Care Pain Mgt. Rehab., 305 AD2d 223, 224; Brookhaven Anesthesia Assocs. v. Flaherty, 2004 NY Slip Op 51035[U]).

This constitutes the decision and order of the Court.


Summaries of

McFadden v. Isseks Bros. Inc.

Appellate Term of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Apr 8, 2005
2005 N.Y. Slip Op. 50509 (N.Y. App. Term 2005)
Case details for

McFadden v. Isseks Bros. Inc.

Case Details

Full title:MARY C. McFADDEN, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. ISSEKS BROS. INC.…

Court:Appellate Term of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Apr 8, 2005

Citations

2005 N.Y. Slip Op. 50509 (N.Y. App. Term 2005)