From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McFadden v. Herman

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Feb 15, 2013
9:09-CV-1415 (N.D.N.Y. Feb. 15, 2013)

Opinion

9:09-CV-1415

02-15-2013

BRANDON MCFADDEN, Plaintiff, v. SCOTT HERMAN, et al., Defendants.


THOMAS J. McAVOY,
Senior United States District Judge

DECISION & ORDER

I. INTRODUCTION

This pro se action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 was referred to the Hon. Andrew T. Baxter, United States Magistrate Judge, for a Report and Recommendation pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Local Rule 72.3(c). No objections to Magistrate Judge Baxter's Report-Recommendation [dkt. # 54] have been filed, and the time to do so has expired. Furthermore, after examining the record, this Court has determined that the Report-Recommendation is not subject to attack for plain error or manifest injustice.

II. CONCLUSION

Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS the Report-Recommendation [dkt. # 54] for the reasons stated therein. Therefore, Defendants' motion to dismiss [Dkt. # 53] is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. All claims brought against Defendants Herman and Finton in their official capacities are DISMISSED. Any claim alleging the failure to intervene brought against Defendant Herman in his personal capacity is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. The motion is DENIED as to Plaintiff's claim of excessive force brought against Defendant Finton in his personal capacity.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

________

Thomas J. McAvoy

Senior, U.S. District Judge


Summaries of

McFadden v. Herman

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Feb 15, 2013
9:09-CV-1415 (N.D.N.Y. Feb. 15, 2013)
Case details for

McFadden v. Herman

Case Details

Full title:BRANDON MCFADDEN, Plaintiff, v. SCOTT HERMAN, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Date published: Feb 15, 2013

Citations

9:09-CV-1415 (N.D.N.Y. Feb. 15, 2013)