From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McFadden v. Fuyao North America Inc.

UNITED STATE DISTRICT COURT EASTER DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Jun 27, 2012
Case No.: 10-cv-14457 (E.D. Mich. Jun. 27, 2012)

Opinion

Case No.: 10-cv-14457

06-27-2012

GILBERT McFADDEN, Plaintiff, v. FUYAO NORTH AMERICA INCORPORATED a South Carolina Corporation, and FUYAO GLASS INDUSTRIES GROUP CO., LTD, CURVED GLASS DISTRIBUTORS OF 72 CHAPEL STREET, DefendantS.

MINDELL MALIN KUTINSKY STONE & BLATNIKOFF BRIAN A. KUTINSKY (P39107) Attorney for Plaintiff LAW OFFICES OF GAIL L. STORCK ANN E. MERRY (P36009) Attorney for Def. Fuyao North America ROBERT N. HESTON (P63934) Attorney for Def. Curved Glass DAVE A. RAMMELT Attorney for Def. Fuyao Glass JAMES D. ROUSH (P73024) Attorney for Def. Fuyao Glass


Honorable GEORGE CARAM STEEH

MINDELL MALIN KUTINSKY STONE

& BLATNIKOFF

BRIAN A. KUTINSKY (P39107)

Attorney for Plaintiff

LAW OFFICES OF GAIL L. STORCK

ANN E. MERRY (P36009)

Attorney for Def. Fuyao North America

ROBERT N. HESTON (P63934)

Attorney for Def. Curved Glass

DAVE A. RAMMELT

Attorney for Def. Fuyao Glass

JAMES D. ROUSH (P73024)

Attorney for Def. Fuyao Glass

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER

The Court orders as follows:

1. Each party shall mark all documents subject to this Protective Order as "Confidential." The documents and information contained therein shall be used, shown, and disclosed only as provided in this Protective Order. The term "Confidential" as used in this Protective Order shall be construed to include all of the information contained in each document so marked.
2. Confidential documents and information shall be made available only to "Qualified Persons." The term "Qualified Persons" means the Court and its officers, the parties, counsel of record, independent experts and consultants, and those clerical employees assisting each counsel, independent expert, and consultant. No person shall have access to Confidential documents or information unless they are a "Qualified Person." No person who gains access to such Confidential documents or information may disclose their contents or the information contained therein to any person other than a "Qualified Person."
3. Confidential documents and information may be disclosed and used solely for the purpose of this lawsuit and for no other purpose.
4. Confidential documents and information may be used at trial or at depositions in accordance with the following safeguards. If Confidential documents and information are used in depositions or at trial, all portions of the transcript of such depositions and trial testimony, and exhibits thereto, that refer or relate to such Confidential documents and information shall themselves be considered to be Confidential and subject to this Protective Order.
5. Confidential documents and information shall not be filed with the Court Clerk unless an exception under Local Rule 26.4 (c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure applies.
6. At the conclusion of this action, all Confidential documents and information and all copies thereof, shall be returned to counsel for the disclosing party or destroyed.
7. If any party contends that any document, information, or portion thereof that another party designates as Confidential is not entitled to protection, that party must so notify the disclosing party in writing. The disclosing party shall serve upon such party an Affidavit or other appropriate document in support of its claim of confidentiality within ten (10) days of receipt of the notice. If the party is so advised, it may then move the Court to resolve the dispute over confidentiality. The information shall continue to be protected as Confidential until further Order of the Court pursuant to a hearing.
8. Nothing in this Protective Order will prejudice any party from seeking amendments broadening or restricting the rights of access to and use of Confidential documents and information, contesting the designation of documents or information as Confidential, or contesting the designation of a person as a Qualified Person.

George Caram Steeh

United States District Judge

So stipulated:

By: BRIAN A. KUTINSKY

MINDELL MALIN KUTINSKY STONE

& BLATNIKOFF

Attorney for Plaintiff

25505 W. 12 Mile Road, #1000

Southfield, MI 48034

(248) 353-5595

By: ANN E. MERRY

LAW OFFICES OF GAIL L. STORCK

Attorney for Def. Fuyao North America

700 Tower Drive, Suite 550

Troy, MI 48098

(248) 631-2101

By: ROBERT N. HESTON (P63934)

Attorney for Def. Curved Glass

One Towne Square, Ste. 470

Southfield, MI 48076

(248) 223-0120

By: DAVE A. RAMMELT

Attorney for Def. Fuyao Glass

70 W. Madison St., Ste. 3100

Chicago, IL 60602-4207

(312) 807-4414

By: JAMES D. ROUSH (P73024)

Attorney for Def. Fuyao Glass

201 South Division Street, Ste. 400

Ann Arbor, MI 48104

(734) 930-0237


Summaries of

McFadden v. Fuyao North America Inc.

UNITED STATE DISTRICT COURT EASTER DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Jun 27, 2012
Case No.: 10-cv-14457 (E.D. Mich. Jun. 27, 2012)
Case details for

McFadden v. Fuyao North America Inc.

Case Details

Full title:GILBERT McFADDEN, Plaintiff, v. FUYAO NORTH AMERICA INCORPORATED a South…

Court:UNITED STATE DISTRICT COURT EASTER DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Jun 27, 2012

Citations

Case No.: 10-cv-14457 (E.D. Mich. Jun. 27, 2012)