From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McDowell v. Unknown Party

United States District Court, District of Arizona
Oct 8, 2021
No. CV-19-05102-PHX-SMB (D. Ariz. Oct. 8, 2021)

Opinion

CV-19-05102-PHX-SMB

10-08-2021

Garrick Roy McDowell, Plaintiff, v. Unknown Party, Defendant.


ORDER

Honorable Susan M. Brnovich United States District Judge

United States Magistrate Eileen S. Willett has issued a report and recommendation (“R&R”) recommending that the Second Amended Complaint dismissed without prejudice for Plaintiff's failure to comply with the Court's Order and prosecute pursuant to Fed. R.Civ. P. 41(b). (Doc. 27). The Magistrate Judge advised the parties that they had fourteen days to file objections to the R&R. (R&R at 7-8) (citing Rule 72, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure) No. objection has been filed, which relieves the Court of its obligation to review the R&R. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b)(3);Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003). Nevertheless, the Court has reviewed the pleadings and agrees with the analysis of Magistrate Willett. The Court will accept and adopt the R&R.

IT IS ORDERED:

(1) Accepting and adopting the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. 27);

(2) Dismissing this action without prejudice and directing the Clerk of Court to terminate this action.


Summaries of

McDowell v. Unknown Party

United States District Court, District of Arizona
Oct 8, 2021
No. CV-19-05102-PHX-SMB (D. Ariz. Oct. 8, 2021)
Case details for

McDowell v. Unknown Party

Case Details

Full title:Garrick Roy McDowell, Plaintiff, v. Unknown Party, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, District of Arizona

Date published: Oct 8, 2021

Citations

No. CV-19-05102-PHX-SMB (D. Ariz. Oct. 8, 2021)