Opinion
October 20, 1997
Appeal from the Supreme Courts, Kings County (Rappaport, J.).
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
We agree with the Supreme Court that the medical evidence which the plaintiff submitted in opposition to the motion for summary judgment raised a triable issue of fact as to whether he sustained a serious injury as defined by Insurance Law § 5102 (d) ( see CPLR 3212 [b]).
Bracken, J.P., Pizzuto, Altman and Krausman, JJ., concur.