Opinion
Civil Action 00-1046-CB-C.
February 20, 2001.
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
Plaintiff, an Alabama prison inmate proceeding pro se filed a complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 together with a Motion to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees and Costs. This action has been referred to the undersigned pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(B)and Local Rule 72.2 (c)(4) and is now before the Court for Plaintiff's failure to prosecute and to obey the Court's order.
Upon review of Plaintiff's complaint and Motion to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees and Costs, the Court found that the motion to proceed without prepayment of fees and costs was filed on an outdated form. Thereupon, Plaintiff was ordered by January 18, 2001 to complete and file this Court's current form for a motion to proceed without prepayment of fees. Plaintiff was warned that his failure to comply with the Court's order within the prescribed time would result in the dismissal without prejudice of this action. Plaintiff has not responded in any manner to the Court's order, nor is there any indication that Plaintiff did not receive a copy of the Court's order.
Due to Plaintiff's failure to comply with the Court's order and to prosecute this action, and upon consideration other available alternatives, it is recommended that this action be dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for failure to prosecute and to obey the Court's order, as no other lesser sanction will suffice. Link v. Wabash R.R., 370 U.S. 626, 630, 82 S.Ct. 1386, 1388-89, 8 L.Ed.2d 734, 738 (1962) (interpreting Rule 41(b) not to restrict the court's inherent authority to dismiss sua sponte an action for lack of prosecution); World Thrust Films. Inc. v. International Family Entertainment, Inc., 41 F.3d 1454, 1456-57 (11th Cir. 1995); Ballard v. Carlson, 882 F.2d 93 (4th Cir. 1989), cert. denied, Ballard v. Volunteers of America, 493 U.S. 1084, 110 S.Ct. 1145, 107 L.Ed.2d 1049 (1990); Mingo v. Sugar Cane Growers Co-op, 864 F.2d 101, 102 (11th Cir. 1989); Goforth v. Owens, 766 F.2d 1533, 1535 (11th Cir. 1985); Jones v. Graham, 709 F.2d 1457, 1458 (11th Cir. 1993). Accord Chambers v. NASCO, Inc., 501 U.S. 32, 111 S.Ct. 2123, 115 L.Ed.2d 27 (1991) (ruling that federal courts' inherent power to manage their own proceedings authorized the imposition of attorney's fees and related expenses as a sanction); Malautea v. Suzuki Motor Co., 987 F.2d 1536, 1545-46 (11th Cir. 1993) (finding that the court's inherent power to manage actions before it permitted the imposition of fines), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 863, 114 S.Ct. 181, 126 L.Ed.2d 140 (1993).