Opinion
No. 127660.
June 1, 2007.
Reported below: 264 Mich App 337.
Reconsideration Denied.
Summary disposition entered at 477 Mich 1079.
We would grant reconsideration for the reasons set forth in Justice CAVANAGH'S dissent to the April 11, 2007, order.
I would grant plaintiff's motion for reconsideration. I write further to state that I dissent from the participation of the majority of four, Chief Justice TAYLOR and Justices CORRIGAN, YOUNG, and MARKMAN in this case, where Mr. Geoffrey N. Fieger's law firm represents the plaintiff. For my reasons in detail, see my dissent in Grievance Administrator v Fieger, 476 Mich 231, 328-347 (2006) (WEAVER J., dissenting), and my dissent to the denial of the motion for stay in Grievance Administrator v Fieger, 477 Mich 1228, 1231-1271 (2006) (WEAVER, J., dissenting).