From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McDowell v. Bishop

United States District Court, E.D. California
May 11, 2011
No. 2:06-cv-02145 MCE GGH P (E.D. Cal. May. 11, 2011)

Opinion

No. 2:06-cv-02145 MCE GGH P.

May 11, 2011


ORDER


On April 29, 2011, plaintiff filed a motion for reconsideration of the magistrate judge's order filed April 18, 2011, denying plaintiff's March 7, 2011 motion to supplement the record in opposition to defendant Ginder's motion for summary judgment. Pursuant to E.D. Local Rule 303(f), a magistrate judge's orders shall be upheld unless "clearly erroneous or contrary to law." Upon review of the entire file, the court finds that it does not appear that the magistrate judge's ruling was clearly erroneous or contrary to law.

Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, upon reconsideration, the order of the magistrate judge filed April 18, 2011, is AFFIRMED.

Dated: May 10, 2011


Summaries of

McDowell v. Bishop

United States District Court, E.D. California
May 11, 2011
No. 2:06-cv-02145 MCE GGH P (E.D. Cal. May. 11, 2011)
Case details for

McDowell v. Bishop

Case Details

Full title:DANNY McDOWELL, Plaintiff, v. J.L. BISHOP, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: May 11, 2011

Citations

No. 2:06-cv-02145 MCE GGH P (E.D. Cal. May. 11, 2011)