From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McDowell v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE at CHATTANOOGA
Jun 5, 2013
Case No. 1:12-cv-82 (E.D. Tenn. Jun. 5, 2013)

Opinion

Case No. 1:12-cv-82

06-05-2013

TIFANIE DEE ANN MCDOWELL, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL S. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.


Judge Mattice

Magistrate Judge Carter


ORDER

On April 3, 2013, United States Magistrate Judge William Carter filed his Report and Recommendation (Doc. 18) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b). Magistrate Judge Carter recommended that (1) Plaintiff's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (Doc. 14) be denied; (2) Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 16) be granted; (3) the Decision of the Commissioner be affirmed; and (4) this action be dismissed.

Plaintiff has filed no objections to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation. Nevertheless, the Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation as well as the record, and it agrees with Magistrate Judge Carter's well-reasoned conclusions.

Accordingly:

• The Court ACCEPTS and ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Carter's findings of fact, conclusions of law, and recommendations pursuant to § 636(b)(1) and Rule 72(b);
• Plaintiff's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (Doc. 14) is DENIED;
• Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 16) is GRANTED;
• The decision of the Commissioner is AFFIRMED; and
• This case is hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

_________________

HARRY S. MATTICE, JR.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

McDowell v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE at CHATTANOOGA
Jun 5, 2013
Case No. 1:12-cv-82 (E.D. Tenn. Jun. 5, 2013)
Case details for

McDowell v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:TIFANIE DEE ANN MCDOWELL, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL S. ASTRUE, Commissioner of…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE at CHATTANOOGA

Date published: Jun 5, 2013

Citations

Case No. 1:12-cv-82 (E.D. Tenn. Jun. 5, 2013)