From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McDonald v. Holland

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jun 30, 2015
NO. ED CV 14-2499-JAK(E) (C.D. Cal. Jun. 30, 2015)

Opinion

NO. ED CV 14-2499-JAK(E)

06-30-2015

LAWRENCE MCDONALD, Petitioner, v. KIM HOLLAND, Warden, Respondent.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. section 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, all of the records herein and the attached Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge. Further, the Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report and Recommendation to which any objections have been made. The Court accepts and adopts the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation.

IT IS ORDERED that the Motion to Dismiss is denied without prejudice as moot, and Judgment shall be entered denying and dismissing the Petition with prejudice.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk serve copies of this Order, the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation and the Judgment herein on Petitioner and on counsel for Respondent.

LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.

DATED: June 30, 2015.

/s/_________

JOHN A. KRONSTADT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

McDonald v. Holland

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jun 30, 2015
NO. ED CV 14-2499-JAK(E) (C.D. Cal. Jun. 30, 2015)
Case details for

McDonald v. Holland

Case Details

Full title:LAWRENCE MCDONALD, Petitioner, v. KIM HOLLAND, Warden, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jun 30, 2015

Citations

NO. ED CV 14-2499-JAK(E) (C.D. Cal. Jun. 30, 2015)