From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McDonald v. Fountain

United States District Court, Northern District of Florida
Jun 29, 2021
3:20cv5665-MCR-HTC (N.D. Fla. Jun. 29, 2021)

Opinion

3:20cv5665-MCR-HTC

06-29-2021

ROBERT MICHAEL MCDONALD, Plaintiff, v. GRAHAM FOUNTAIN and ERIC ESMOND, Defendants.


ORDER

M. CASEY RODGERS, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation dated February 16, 2021. ECF No. 21. The parties have been furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of all timely filed objections.

Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and any objections thereto timely filed, I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

(1) The magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation is adopted and incorporated by reference in this Order.

(2) This matter is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e)(2) and 1915A for failure to state a claim.

(3) The clerk is directed to close the file.

DONE AND ORDERED.


Summaries of

McDonald v. Fountain

United States District Court, Northern District of Florida
Jun 29, 2021
3:20cv5665-MCR-HTC (N.D. Fla. Jun. 29, 2021)
Case details for

McDonald v. Fountain

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT MICHAEL MCDONALD, Plaintiff, v. GRAHAM FOUNTAIN and ERIC ESMOND…

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of Florida

Date published: Jun 29, 2021

Citations

3:20cv5665-MCR-HTC (N.D. Fla. Jun. 29, 2021)