From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McDonald v. Emp't Sec. Dep't

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA
May 9, 2013
CASE NO. No. 13-5248-RBL (W.D. Wash. May. 9, 2013)

Opinion

CASE NO. No. 13-5248-RBL

05-09-2013

YVONNE MCDONALD Plaintiff, v. EMPLOYMENT SECURITY DEPARTMENT, et al., Defendant.


HONORABLE RONALD B. LEIGHTON


ORDER DENYING MOTION TO

APPOINT COUNSEL


[DKT. #2]

THIS MATTER is before the Court upon Plaintiff's Motion for Court-Appointed Counsel [Dkt. #2].

There is no right to counsel in a civil case. The Court may appoint counsel under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1) in exceptional circumstances. Wilborn v. Escalderon, 789 F.2d 1328, 1331 (9th Cir. 1986). A finding of exceptional circumstances requires an evaluation of both the likelihood of success on the merits and the ability of the Plaintiff to articulate her claims pro se. Id.

The plaintiff has not shown that she is likely to succeed on the merits of the case. As the court explained in its order denying Plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis, the proposed complaint fails to state a claim for which relief could be granted. Plaintiff's Motion for Court-Appointed Counsel is DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

The Clerk shall send uncertified copies of this order to all counsel of record, and to any party appearing pro se.

_________________

RONALD B. LEIGHTON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

McDonald v. Emp't Sec. Dep't

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA
May 9, 2013
CASE NO. No. 13-5248-RBL (W.D. Wash. May. 9, 2013)
Case details for

McDonald v. Emp't Sec. Dep't

Case Details

Full title:YVONNE MCDONALD Plaintiff, v. EMPLOYMENT SECURITY DEPARTMENT, et al.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA

Date published: May 9, 2013

Citations

CASE NO. No. 13-5248-RBL (W.D. Wash. May. 9, 2013)