From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McDonald v. County of San Diego

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Apr 1, 2005
124 F. App'x 588 (9th Cir. 2005)

Opinion

Submitted March 23, 2005.

This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION. (See Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure Rule 36-3)

Blair Kruegar, II, Esq., The Kruegar Group, La Jolla, CA, William L. Parker, Esq., Law Office of William L. Parker, Rochester, NY, for Plaintiffs-Appellants.

Timothy M. Barry, Esq., Offices of County Counsel County of San Diego, James M. Chapin, Esq., San Diego City Attorney's Office, San Diego, CA, for Defendants-Appellees.


Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California, Irma E. Gonzalez, District Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. CV-04-2265-IEG.

Before: B. FLETCHER, TROTT, and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

Shan L. McDonald, Jerri Walters, and Jennifer Cassidy appeal the district court's order denying their motion for a preliminary injunction against certification of the results of the San Diego mayoral election held on November 2, 2004. They claim that the City's allowance of a write-in candidate violated the Equal Protection Clause of the United States Constitution, the California Constitution, and the City Charter. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1292(a)(1), and we affirm.

Our review of an order denying a preliminary injunction is limited and deferential. Southwest Voter Registration Educ. Project v. Shelley, 344 F.3d 914, 918 (9th Cir.2003) (en banc). The district court did not abuse its discretion in concluding that the appellants failed to demonstrate a likelihood of success on the merits because their equal protection claim, filed after the election, was barred by the equitable defense of laches. See id. at 917-18; Soules v. Kauaians for Nukolii Campaign Comm., 849 F.2d 1176, 1181 (9th Cir.1988). The district court also did not abuse its discretion in its consideration of the balance of the hardships, the possibility of irreparable injury, and the public interest. See Southwest Voter Registration Educ. Project, 344 F.3d at 917-18.

AFFIRMED.

Appellants' request for judicial notice is granted.


Summaries of

McDonald v. County of San Diego

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Apr 1, 2005
124 F. App'x 588 (9th Cir. 2005)
Case details for

McDonald v. County of San Diego

Case Details

Full title:Shan L. MCDONALD; Jerri Walters; Jennifer Cassidy, Plaintiffs--Appellants…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Apr 1, 2005

Citations

124 F. App'x 588 (9th Cir. 2005)

Citing Cases

King v. Whitmer

The rationale for interposing the doctrine of laches is now at its peak. SeeMcDonald v. Cnty. of San Diego ,…