From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McDonald v. City of Chicago

United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division
Nov 13, 2008
No. 08 C 3645 (N.D. Ill. Nov. 13, 2008)

Opinion

No. 08 C 3645.

November 13, 2008


MEMORANDUM ORDER


On October 21, 2008 plaintiffs' counsel filed a "Motion To Narrow Legal Issues," intending to comply with this District Court's Rule (and this Court's website reference to that rule) by contemporaneously mailing a paper counterpart of that electronic filing to this Court's chambers. Counsel's express-mail transmittal was properly addressed to:

The Honorable Milton I. Shadur
Everett McKinley Dirksen Building
Room 2388
219 South Dearborn Street
Chicago IL 60604

Mysteriously the postal authorities stamped the envelope "Addressee unknown," and nearly two weeks later the mailing found its way back to counsel's office in Lisle, Illinois. This Court will put aside the Postal Service's apparent determination that this Court is a non-person, even though it has been occupying the Room 2388 judicial chambers for years — instead this memorandum is issued simply to reassure plaintiffs' counsel that no violation of court rules is to be placed at his doorstep.


Summaries of

McDonald v. City of Chicago

United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division
Nov 13, 2008
No. 08 C 3645 (N.D. Ill. Nov. 13, 2008)
Case details for

McDonald v. City of Chicago

Case Details

Full title:OTIS McDONALD, et al., Plaintiffs, v. CITY OF CHICAGO, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division

Date published: Nov 13, 2008

Citations

No. 08 C 3645 (N.D. Ill. Nov. 13, 2008)