From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McDeavitt v. McCarthy

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
May 14, 2018
Civil Action No. 18-249 (W.D. Pa. May. 14, 2018)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 18-249

05-14-2018

Pamela McDeavitt and Leo L. McDeavitt, Jr., Plaintiffs, v. The Honorable Michael McCarthy, The Honorable Judith Friedman, The Fifth Judicial District, Beneficial Consumer Discount Company d/b/a Beneficial Mortgage Company of Pennsylvania, Andrew Stutzman, Michelle Badolato, Ian Long, Stradley, Ronon, Stevens and Young, Kim Hong, Tony (Motions Clerk), Defendants.


District Judge David S. Cercone /
Magistrate Judge Lenihan ECF No. 3 MEMORANDUM ORDER

This civil action was commenced on February 27, 2018 when Plaintiffs Leo L. McDeavitt, Jr., and Pamela McDeavitt filed a Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis. (ECF No. 1.) That motion was granted (ECF No. 2) and the Complaint was docketed on March 14, 2018. (ECF No. 3.) The case was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Lisa Pupo Lenihan for pretrial proceedings in accordance with the Magistrate Judges Act, 28 U.S.C. §636(b)(1), and Local Rules of Court 72.C and 72.D.

The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 4), filed on April 10, 2018, recommended that the Plaintiffs' Complaint be dismissed with prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B), as frivolous, for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, and because it seeks monetary relief against a defendant who is immune from such relief. Service was made on Plaintiffs via first class mail to their address of record. The parties were informed that in accordance with the Magistrate Judges Act, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and (C), and Rule 72.D.2 of the Local Rules of Court, that they had fourteen (14) days to file any objections, and that unregistered ECF users were given an additional three (3) days pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 6(d). Objections for unregistered ECF Users were due by April 27, 2018. (ECF No. 4.) On April 26, 2018, Plaintiffs filed their Objections to the Report and Recommendation. (ECF No. 6.)

After review of the pleadings, documents in the case and Plaintiffs' Objections, together with the Report and Recommendation, the following Order is entered:

AND NOW, this 14th day of May, 2018,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiffs' Complaint is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B), as frivolous, for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, and because it seeks monetary relief against a defendant who is immune from such relief.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 4) of Magistrate Judge Lenihan, dated April 10, 2018, is adopted as the Opinion of the Court.

/s/_________

David Stewart Cercone

Senior United States District Judge cc: Leo L. Mcdeavitt, Jr.

104 Dorf Drive

Pittsburgh, PA 15209

(Via First Class Mail)

Pamela McDeavitt

104 Dorf Avenue

Pittsburgh, PA 15209

(Via First Class Mail)


Summaries of

McDeavitt v. McCarthy

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
May 14, 2018
Civil Action No. 18-249 (W.D. Pa. May. 14, 2018)
Case details for

McDeavitt v. McCarthy

Case Details

Full title:Pamela McDeavitt and Leo L. McDeavitt, Jr., Plaintiffs, v. The Honorable…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: May 14, 2018

Citations

Civil Action No. 18-249 (W.D. Pa. May. 14, 2018)