From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McDaniel v. United States

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Sep 27, 2021
2:15-cv-2627-KJM-EFB PS (E.D. Cal. Sep. 27, 2021)

Opinion

2:15-cv-2627-KJM-EFB PS

09-27-2021

TANYA GRACE McDANIEL, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

On March 9, 2021, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, which were served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. No. objections were filed.

The court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge's conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See Robbins v. Carey, 481 F.3d 1143, 1147 (9th Cir. 2007) (“[D]eterminations of law by the magistrate judge are reviewed de novo by both the district court and [the appellate] court . . . .”). Having reviewed the file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations filed March 9, 2021, are ADOPTED; and

2. No pre-filing order or order declaring plaintiff a vexatious litigant shall issue.


Summaries of

McDaniel v. United States

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Sep 27, 2021
2:15-cv-2627-KJM-EFB PS (E.D. Cal. Sep. 27, 2021)
Case details for

McDaniel v. United States

Case Details

Full title:TANYA GRACE McDANIEL, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al.…

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Sep 27, 2021

Citations

2:15-cv-2627-KJM-EFB PS (E.D. Cal. Sep. 27, 2021)