From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McDaniel v. Sorber

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Oct 4, 2022
Civil Action 21-738 (E.D. Pa. Oct. 4, 2022)

Opinion

Civil Action 21-738

10-04-2022

GLENN MCDANIEL, Petitioner, v. JAMIE SORBER, et al., Respondent.


ORDER

JOEL H. SLOMSKY, J.

AND NOW, this 4th day of October 2022, upon independent consideration of Petitioner's Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. No. 1), the Government's Response (Doc. No. 26), and the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Elizabeth T. Hey (Doc. No. 27), it is ORDERED that:

1. The Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 27) is APPROVED and ADOPTED.

2. The Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. No. 1) is DENIED.

3. A Certificate of Appealability SHALL NOT issue because, based on the analysis contained in the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, as approved and adopted by this Court, there has been no substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2).

4. The Clerk of Court shall close this case for statistical purposes.


Summaries of

McDaniel v. Sorber

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Oct 4, 2022
Civil Action 21-738 (E.D. Pa. Oct. 4, 2022)
Case details for

McDaniel v. Sorber

Case Details

Full title:GLENN MCDANIEL, Petitioner, v. JAMIE SORBER, et al., Respondent.

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Oct 4, 2022

Citations

Civil Action 21-738 (E.D. Pa. Oct. 4, 2022)

Citing Cases

Pinson v. Coleman

The admissibility of evidence in Pinson's state-court case is governed by the Pennsylvania Rules of Evidence.…