From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McDaniel v. Lanier

United States District Court, D. Columbia
Jun 10, 2009
Civil Action No. 09-7 (RMC) (D.D.C. Jun. 10, 2009)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 09-7 (RMC).

June 10, 2009


MEMORANDUM OPINION


This matter is before the Court on defendant Cathy L. Lanier's motion to dismiss the amended complaint [Dkt. # 6]. Ms. Lanier asserts that "Plaintiff's claims are so attenuated and unsubstantiated as to be devoid of merit" or, as an alternative, are "barred by the public duty doctrine." Def.'s Mem. of P. A. at 1. By Order of March 4, 2009 [Dkt. # 7], the Court directed Mr. McDaniel to respond to Ms. Lanier's motion by April 9, 2009, and advised of the consequences if he did not. Mr. McDaniel has neither responded nor sought additional time to do so. The Court therefore will grant Ms. Lanier's motion to dismiss as conceded. A separate Order of dismissal accompanies this Memorandum Opinion.


Summaries of

McDaniel v. Lanier

United States District Court, D. Columbia
Jun 10, 2009
Civil Action No. 09-7 (RMC) (D.D.C. Jun. 10, 2009)
Case details for

McDaniel v. Lanier

Case Details

Full title:RONNIE LEE McDANIEL, Plaintiff, v. CATHY L. LANIER, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, D. Columbia

Date published: Jun 10, 2009

Citations

Civil Action No. 09-7 (RMC) (D.D.C. Jun. 10, 2009)