From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McDaniel v. Diaz

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Feb 28, 2023
1:20-cv-00856-ADA-SAB (E.D. Cal. Feb. 28, 2023)

Opinion

1:20-cv-00856-ADA-SAB

02-28-2023

DAVID MCDANIEL, Plaintiff, v. RALPH DIAZ, et al., Defendants.


ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO CLOSE CASE AND ADJUST THE DOCKET TO REFLECT VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO RULE 41(A) OF THE FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE

(ECF NO. 103)

On February 27, 2023, the parties filed a stipulation of dismissal. (ECF No. 103.) In light of the stipulation of dismissal, this action has been terminated, Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii); Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997), and has been dismissed with prejudice, with each party to bear its own attorneys' fees and costs.

Accordingly, the Clerk of the Court is HEREBY DIRECTED to close the case and adjust the docket to reflect voluntary dismissal of this action pursuant to Rule 41(a).

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

McDaniel v. Diaz

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Feb 28, 2023
1:20-cv-00856-ADA-SAB (E.D. Cal. Feb. 28, 2023)
Case details for

McDaniel v. Diaz

Case Details

Full title:DAVID MCDANIEL, Plaintiff, v. RALPH DIAZ, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Feb 28, 2023

Citations

1:20-cv-00856-ADA-SAB (E.D. Cal. Feb. 28, 2023)