From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McDaniel v. Cook County Department of Corr. Officer Wade

United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division
Jun 29, 2005
No. 05 C 2265 (N.D. Ill. Jun. 29, 2005)

Opinion

No. 05 C 2265.

June 29, 2005


MEMORANDUM ORDER


Cook County Sheriff Michael Sheahan, Correctional Officer Wade and Cook County itself have filed their joint Answer (including Affirmative Defenses) to the Complaint filed against them by Cook County Department of Corrections ("County Jail") inmate Preonn A. McDaniel ("McDaniel"), in which McDaniel (1) invokes 42 U.S.C. § 1983 to charge a violation of his constitutional rights and (2) adds two state law claims. This memorandum order is issued sua sponte to address some problematic aspects of that responsive pleading.

Further citations to provisions of Title 42 will take the form "Section —."

To begin with, it is frankly difficult to understand how, in the objective good faith required of every pleader under Fed.R.Civ.P ("Rule") 11(b), defendants can disclaim the existence of information sufficient to form a belief as to a number of McDaniel's allegations — see the answers to Facts ¶¶ 1, 2, 5, 6 and 7. It is hard to believe that the County Jail records do not contain information as to the matters recited in those allegations by McDaniel — and harder still to believe that if such information does exist, it is insufficient for defendants to form a belief as to the truth of those allegations. Accordingly, defense counsel is directed to inquire into those matters promptly to see whether an amendment or amendments to those responses may be called for.

Relatedly, it is also hard to see how the disclaimer set out in the second sentence of Rule 8(b) as to FACTS ¶ 7 can be reconciled with defendants' denial of McDaniel's allegations that he has exhausted all administrative remedies before bringing this action (see the answers to Count I ¶ 9 and Count II ¶ 9). And apart from that, those denials call for further inquiry because this Court has the affirmative obligation to ascertain whether McDaniel has exhausted such administrative remedies, as is required by Section 1997e(a) as a precondition to McDaniel's filing of this lawsuit. Hence defense counsel is ordered to submit a supplemental filing in this Court's chambers (with a copy being transmitted contemporaneously to McDaniel's counsel) on or before July 11, 2005 explaining the grounds for such denials.

Affirmative Defense 1 miscites that statute as Section 1997(e).


Summaries of

McDaniel v. Cook County Department of Corr. Officer Wade

United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division
Jun 29, 2005
No. 05 C 2265 (N.D. Ill. Jun. 29, 2005)
Case details for

McDaniel v. Cook County Department of Corr. Officer Wade

Case Details

Full title:Preonn A. McDaniel Plaintiff, v. Cook County Department of Corr. Officer…

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division

Date published: Jun 29, 2005

Citations

No. 05 C 2265 (N.D. Ill. Jun. 29, 2005)