From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McDaniel v. Astrue

United States District Court, E.D. Tennessee, at Chattanooga
Mar 29, 2011
Case No. 1:10-cv-83 (E.D. Tenn. Mar. 29, 2011)

Opinion

Case No. 1:10-cv-83.

March 29, 2011


ORDER


United States Magistrate Judge William B. Mitchell Carter filed his report and recommendation pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b) on March 8, 2011 [Court Doc. 17.] Neither party filed objections within the given 14 days.

After reviewing the record, the Court agrees with Magistrate Judge Carter's report and recommendation. The Court thus ACCEPTS and ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Carter's findings of fact, conclusions of law, and recommendations pursuant to § 636(b)(1) and Rule 72(b).

Accordingly, Plaintiff's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings [Court Doc. 11] is DENIED. Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment [Court Doc. 15] is GRANTED. The Commissioner's denial of benefits is AFFIRMED and the instant action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. The Clerk shall close the case.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

McDaniel v. Astrue

United States District Court, E.D. Tennessee, at Chattanooga
Mar 29, 2011
Case No. 1:10-cv-83 (E.D. Tenn. Mar. 29, 2011)
Case details for

McDaniel v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:JOHN P. McDANIEL, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Tennessee, at Chattanooga

Date published: Mar 29, 2011

Citations

Case No. 1:10-cv-83 (E.D. Tenn. Mar. 29, 2011)