From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McDade v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, Panel Two
Mar 8, 1978
562 S.W.2d 487 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978)

Opinion

No. 57253.

March 8, 1978.

Appeal from the 167th Judicial District Court, Travis County, Tom Blackwell, J.

John L. Darrouzet, Austin, for appellant.

Ronald D. Earle, Dist. Atty. and Charles E. Hardy, Asst. Dist. Atty., Austin, for the State.

Before ONION, P. J., and DOUGLAS and ODOM, JJ.


OPINION


Eddie McDade was convicted for burglary. His punishment was assessed at five years. On appeal he contends that he was not admonished by the trial judge as to range of punishment before the plea of guilty was accepted.

Initially McDade entered a plea of not guilty. After evidence was introduced, he informed the judge that he wanted to enter a plea of guilty. A full record of the proceedings is before this Court and it does not reflect that he was admonished as to the range of punishment before the judge accepted his plea. Under Article 26.13, V.A.C.C.P., this must be done before a plea of guilty may be accepted. See Murray v. State, 562 S.W.2d 821 (1977).

The judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.


Summaries of

McDade v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, Panel Two
Mar 8, 1978
562 S.W.2d 487 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978)
Case details for

McDade v. State

Case Details

Full title:Eddie McDADE, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee

Court:Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, Panel Two

Date published: Mar 8, 1978

Citations

562 S.W.2d 487 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978)

Citing Cases

Whitten v. State

Art. 26.13(a)(1), V.A.C.C.P. If the record does not affirmatively show an admonishment as to the range of…

Weekley v. State

The complete failure to admonish the accused of the range of punishment has been held to constitute…