From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McDade v. Perez

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Oct 20, 2023
1:23-cv-00157 CDB (E.D. Cal. Oct. 20, 2023)

Opinion

1:23-cv-00157 CDB

10-20-2023

CARLTON L. McDADE, Plaintiff, v. J. PRADO PEREZ, et al., Defendants.


ORDER RE VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL (DOC. 15)

ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF THE COURT TO CLOSE CASE

Plaintiff Carlton L McDade filed a notice of voluntary dismissal on October 19, 2023. (Doc. 15.) Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1), a “plaintiff may dismiss an action without a court order by filing a notice of dismissal before the opposing party serves either an answer or a motion for summary judgment.” Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i). Once a dismissal under Rule 41(a)(1) is properly filed, no order of the court is necessary to effectuate dismissal; the dismissal is effective automatically. Commercial Space Mgmt. Co. v. Boeing Co., 193 F.3d 1074, 1078 (9th Cir. 1999).

Because Plaintiff has filed a notice of dismissal, and no opposing party has filed an answer or a motion for summary judgment, this action has terminated. Accordingly, the Court DIRECTS the Clerk of the Court to terminate all pending motions and to close this case.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

McDade v. Perez

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Oct 20, 2023
1:23-cv-00157 CDB (E.D. Cal. Oct. 20, 2023)
Case details for

McDade v. Perez

Case Details

Full title:CARLTON L. McDADE, Plaintiff, v. J. PRADO PEREZ, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Oct 20, 2023

Citations

1:23-cv-00157 CDB (E.D. Cal. Oct. 20, 2023)