From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McCurdy v. Kirkegard

United States District Court, D. Nevada
Jun 21, 2010
2:08-CR-01742-PMP-PAL (D. Nev. Jun. 21, 2010)

Opinion

2:08-CR-01742-PMP-PAL.

June 21, 2010


ORDER


Before the Court for consideration is (Doc. #47) Plaintiff Laurice McCurdy's Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Defendant Leroy Kirkegard's Motion to Dismiss (Doc. #39) and Defendant Corrections Corporation of America's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Amended Complaint (Doc. #43).

In addition, is Plaintiff's Motion to Include Nurse Larry in Service Order (Doc. #38), filed on May 21, 2010, and good cause appearing,

IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff Laurice McCurdy's Motion for Extension of Time (Doc. #47) is GRANTED. Plaintiff shall have to and including July 12, 2010 , to Respond to Defendant Leroy Kirkegard's Motion to Dismiss (Doc. #39) and Defendant Corrections Corporation of America's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Amended Complaint (Doc. #43). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion to Include Nurse Larry in Service Order (Doc. #38) is DENIED.


Summaries of

McCurdy v. Kirkegard

United States District Court, D. Nevada
Jun 21, 2010
2:08-CR-01742-PMP-PAL (D. Nev. Jun. 21, 2010)
Case details for

McCurdy v. Kirkegard

Case Details

Full title:LAURICE McCURDY, Plaintiff, v. LEROY KIRKEGARD, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, D. Nevada

Date published: Jun 21, 2010

Citations

2:08-CR-01742-PMP-PAL (D. Nev. Jun. 21, 2010)