From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McCune v. State

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Apr 9, 2013
No. 61381 (Nev. Apr. 9, 2013)

Opinion

No. 61381

04-09-2013

DONALD RAY MCCUNE, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent.


An unpublished order shall not be regarded as precedent and shall not be cited as legal authority. SCR 123.

ORDER OF AFFIRMANCE

This is a proper person appeal from an order of the district court denying a post-conviction petition for a writ of habeas corpus. Second Judicial District Court, Washoe County; Steven R. Kosach, Judge.

This appeal has been submitted for decision without oral argument, NRAP 34(f)(3), and we conclude that the record is sufficient for our review and briefing is unwarranted. See Luckett v. Warden, 91 Nev. 681, 682, 541 P.2d 910, 911(1975).

Appellant filed his petition on April 13, 2012, more than twelve years after entry of the judgment of conviction on February 9, 2000. Thus, appellant's petition was untimely filed. See NRS 34.726(1). Appellant's petition was procedurally barred absent a demonstration of good cause: cause for the delay and undue prejudice. See id. Appellant failed to set forth any arguments explaining his twelve-year delay in filing a petition. To the extent that appellant suggested his mental status explained his delay, and even assuming without deciding that a defendant's mental status could provide good cause, we note that appellant was determined to be competent during the trial proceedings and appellant failed to demonstrate that a change occurred in his mental status that would explain his delay in filing the petition. Accordingly, we ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED.

This court has held that a defendant's lack of knowledge and mental status did not constitute good cause to excuse a procedurally defective petition. Phelps v. Director, Prisons, 104 Nev. 656, 764 P.2d 1303 (1988).

We have reviewed all documents that appellant has submitted in proper person to the clerk of this court in this matter, and we conclude that no relief based upon those submissions is warranted. To the extent that appellant has attempted to present claims or facts in those submissions which were not previously presented in the proceedings below, we have declined to consider them in the first instance.
--------

______________________, J.

Hardesty

______________________, J.

Parraguirre

______________________, J.

Cherry
cc: Hon. Lidia Stiglich, District Judge

Donald Ray McCune

Attorney General/Carson City

Washoe County District Attorney

Washoe District Court Clerk


Summaries of

McCune v. State

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Apr 9, 2013
No. 61381 (Nev. Apr. 9, 2013)
Case details for

McCune v. State

Case Details

Full title:DONALD RAY MCCUNE, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent.

Court:SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

Date published: Apr 9, 2013

Citations

No. 61381 (Nev. Apr. 9, 2013)