From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McCune v. Singh

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 16, 2011
NO. CIV S-10-2207 FCD GGH PS (E.D. Cal. Sep. 16, 2011)

Opinion

NO. CIV S-10-2207 FCD GGH PS

09-16-2011

MICHAEL McCUNE, Plaintiff, v. SATNAM SINGH, Defendant.


ORDER

This action was referred to the undersigned pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21). On June 13, 2011, the scheduling order directed defendant to file an answer to the amended complaint within 28 days of the order. Defendant has not filed an answer to the amended complaint.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

Defendant shall show cause, in writing, within fourteen (14) days from the date of this order, why an answer has not been filed, or he shall file an answer. Failure to comply with this order will result in sanctions, including the possibility of default.

Gregory G. Hollows

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

McCune v. Singh

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 16, 2011
NO. CIV S-10-2207 FCD GGH PS (E.D. Cal. Sep. 16, 2011)
Case details for

McCune v. Singh

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL McCUNE, Plaintiff, v. SATNAM SINGH, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Sep 16, 2011

Citations

NO. CIV S-10-2207 FCD GGH PS (E.D. Cal. Sep. 16, 2011)