From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McCune v. Sandoval

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Aug 24, 2012
Case No. 3:12-CV-00257-RCJ-(WGC) (D. Nev. Aug. 24, 2012)

Opinion

Case No. 3:12-CV-00257-RCJ-(WGC)

08-24-2012

DONALD RAY MCCUNE, Plaintiff, v. BRIAN SANDOVAL, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

The court of appeals has referred the action back to this court to determine whether the appeal is frivolous (#11). Plaintiff sought an injunction regarding findings of insanity, which in turn would necessarily invalidate his judgment of conviction and his confinement. The court dismissed this action because the relief that plaintiff sought is available only through a petition for a writ of habeas corpus. Preiser v. Rodriguez, 411 U.S. 475, 500 (1973). See also Wilkinson v. Dotson, 544 U.S. 74, 81-82 (2005). Furthermore, another inmate was trying to litigate on plaintiff's behalf, and that inmate had no such authority. The law is so well settled on these issues that any appeal is frivolous.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), the appeal is not taken in good faith.

_______________

ROBERT C. JONES

Chief United States District Judge


Summaries of

McCune v. Sandoval

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Aug 24, 2012
Case No. 3:12-CV-00257-RCJ-(WGC) (D. Nev. Aug. 24, 2012)
Case details for

McCune v. Sandoval

Case Details

Full title:DONALD RAY MCCUNE, Plaintiff, v. BRIAN SANDOVAL, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Date published: Aug 24, 2012

Citations

Case No. 3:12-CV-00257-RCJ-(WGC) (D. Nev. Aug. 24, 2012)