From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McCullough v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Mar 15, 2023
No. A23I0157 (Ga. Ct. App. Mar. 15, 2023)

Opinion

A23I0157

03-15-2023

AARON MCCULLOUGH v. STATE OF GEORGIA


The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

Aaron McCullough was cited for speeding under OCGA § 40-14-18, which provides for the imposition of a "civil monetary penalty" against owners of motor vehicles that are caught on camera exceeding the posted speed limit in school zones during school hours. McCullough filed a "Special Demur Motion to Dismiss," arguing that OCGA § 40-14-18 is unconstitutional because it violates the separation of powers doctrine and the confrontation and due process clauses of the state and federal constitutions. Following a hearing at which McCullough raised these constitutional objections, the court entered an order summarily denying the motion. McCullough obtained a certificate of immediate review and filed this interlocutory application, in which he represents that the constitutionality of OCGA § 40-14-18 is a matter of first impression.

The Supreme Court "has exclusive jurisdiction over all cases involving construction of the Constitution of the State of Georgia and of the United States and all cases in which the constitutionality of a law, ordinance, or constitutional provision has been called into question." Atlanta Independent School System v. Lane, 266 Ga. 657, 657 (1) (469 S.E.2d 22) (1996) (citing Ga. Const. of 1983, Art. VI, Sec. VI, Par. II (1)). Because it appears that the trial court necessarily ruled on McCullough's constitutional challenges to OCGA § 40-14-18, jurisdiction over this appeal appears to lie in the Supreme Court. See Wilkes &McHugh, P.A. v. LTC Consulting, L.P., 306 Ga. 252, 257 (1) (c) (830 S.E.2d 119) (2019) (observing that this Court properly transferred the appeal to the Supreme Court based on the plaintiffs' First Amendment challenge to a statute, "which the trial court implicitly rejected" when it entered the order at issue on appeal). As the Supreme Court has the ultimate responsibility for determining appellate jurisdiction, see Saxton v. Coastal Dialysis &Med. Clinic, Inc., 267 Ga. 177, 178 (476 S.E.2d 587) (1996), this appeal is hereby TRANSFERRED to the Supreme Court for disposition.


Summaries of

McCullough v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Mar 15, 2023
No. A23I0157 (Ga. Ct. App. Mar. 15, 2023)
Case details for

McCullough v. State

Case Details

Full title:AARON MCCULLOUGH v. STATE OF GEORGIA

Court:Court of Appeals of Georgia

Date published: Mar 15, 2023

Citations

No. A23I0157 (Ga. Ct. App. Mar. 15, 2023)