From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McCullough v. Corporation

Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Mar 1, 1944
143 F.2d 595 (9th Cir. 1944)

Opinion

No. 9957.

March 1, 1944.

Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of California, Central Division; Leon R. Yankwich, Judge.

On petition for rehearing.

Rehearing denied.

For former opinion, see 138 F.2d 482.

Before DENMAN, MATHEWS, and STEPHENS, Circuit Judges.

R. Welton Whann, of Los Angeles, Cal., and A.W. Boyken, of San Francisco, Cal., for appellant.

Lyon Lyon, of Los Angeles, Cal., for appellee.


In his petition for rehearing appellant has cited Kellogg No. 657,777, Hill No. 1,338,773, and Segelhorst No. 1,599,067 and No. 1,767,018 as being demonstrative of anticipation of Reilly-Stone No. 1,625,391. We do not find in these patents such anticipation.

The petition for rehearing is denied.

MATHEWS, Circuit Judge dissents.


Summaries of

McCullough v. Corporation

Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Mar 1, 1944
143 F.2d 595 (9th Cir. 1944)
Case details for

McCullough v. Corporation

Case Details

Full title:McCULLOUGH v. KAMMERER CORPORATION et al

Court:Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Mar 1, 1944

Citations

143 F.2d 595 (9th Cir. 1944)